Thursday, 4 December 2014

Guest Post by Author Virgina De Parte

How to rejoice over rejections
Hands up if you have NOT BEEN disappointed when a rejection letter arrived in your mail or inbox. Ah, I see there are a few hardy souls out there with tough rhino hides. Lucky you.
As for the rest of us, we need to create an alternative standpoint from which to view rejection letters. It’s not easy but unless you can look at rejections letters as positive feedback it’s very hard to get over them and move forward in your career as an author. Putting them on the floor and jumping on them will make you feel better, but it won’t help you get your work published.
The first thing to remember is -  at least the publisher bothered to reply. Some publishers and agents don’t even do that. If it’s a ‘thank you but no thank you” type letter, without any comments or suggestions then you are free to fold it carefully into a paper dart and aim it at the nearest rubbish bin.  You should then send you piece off promptly to another market you have researched, and suits your work. Think positively. Your shiny new rejection letter proves you are a writer and have had the courage to submit your work for scrutiny.
Once you’ve got over the initial shock that someone doesn’t like your beautiful ‘child’, you need to look for their comments. Whatever they say, and however much you may disagree with them, remember they are the people you have asked to publish your work.
It may be that your story doesn’t suit their publishing stable. This is a valid reason to decline your masterpiece and if that is the only criticism then whip it off straight away to another publishing company on your list. It could be ideal for their selection.
It might be your plot. If they say it doesn’t ring true, has holes, needs to be more plausible, then put your thinking cap on and fix it. If you thought of the plot you can think of a remedy.
Perhaps they don’t like one of your characters. Look at ways to improve them and make them better. One of my male leads was once considered too brutish. I had to look the definition up in the dictionary. Then I put in a whole chapter from his point of view, allowing the poor fellow to have deep feelings and fears – bingo, he was saved and no longer brutish, despite acting like a proper jerk on further occasions. The reader knew his inner turmoil and marshmallow centre. Problem solved.
Too many grammar errors? Find a critique partner who loves correcting grammar or use a programme to fix your manuscript. Then send it off again, elsewhere.
Not enough courtship? Throw in a couple of extra chapters. Put a spanner in the works and take a couple of heart-rending chapters to fix it.
The thing to remember is to be flexible. The story you have created may be the most wonderful arrangement of words the world has ever seen – but if it never gets published the world will never know. Cut a bit out here, add a chapter there, fill this plot hole and kill off another character because there is always the next story you can use those bits in.
When you can’t bear to part with a phrase or paragraph, here’s your answer.  Do as the publisher suggests, but instead of ‘killing your darlings’ as writers are told to do, save them. Cut them out and put them in a file. Call it ‘lost moments,’ ‘precious pieces’ or just plain ‘discarded bits.’ They will sit there safe and secure, like diamonds in a vault, until you need them.
As you edit and rewrite and dance to the suggestions of various publishers who return your unruly ‘chilld’ again and again, consider it all part of the steps you have to climb to be a published author.
The first story is the hardest to get published.  I know. I have a full length novel, completely rewritten three times, that will never be published. I’ve labeled it ‘a learning experience ‘ because rewriting it taught me so much. My current prose, point of view and plots are all the better for 75,000 words rewritten three times.
Let’s consider the case of the writer with one manuscript. S/he’s been writing and rewriting it for years. He won’t submit it anywhere because he can’t face the thought of it being rejected. There are a few of you out there, because I know of three people like this and I don’t know that many writers. My solution to this would be to look for a competition and submit just a portion (the first three chapters or however many words required). Dip you toes in the water and wait for feedback. At least the whole manuscript is not at risk of criticism! Some competitions cost money, some are free – chose your preference.
Another thing you could do is to write a new short piece of fiction. Aim for a novella 15 – 30,000 words. You could use the plot you have, alter it slightly, change some of the major events and wrap it up sooner.  This will give you a second ‘child’ you can send off heartlessly and submit to all the horrors of rejection without ever putting your first creation at risk. Or, try your hand at poetry; write a short story 3 – 5,000 words perhaps. This is a great exercise for condensing a plot. Use these shorter pieces as experiments. Submit them to the horrors of the publishing world, thus protecting your masterpiece until you are ready.
If you do this I guarantee the day will come when you will be ready to submit your ‘first born’ to the rigors of criticism. After you have paddled in the publishing pool with your smaller pieces you will gradually harden up. With luck and perseverance you will receive some feedback and best of all you will gain confidence in your ability to write.  Who knows you could be an undiscovered poet or the master of short stories.
Just a few words of advice: never, ever write a nasty letter back to an editor who has refused to publish your work.  Always reply with a short note thanks for the time and effort they have taken to read it. Remember it has progressed from the slush pile into an editor’s warm grasp, a huge leap toward publishing. I suspect editors may keep a black list of people who write angry missives to them and you may want to submit work in the future to this publisher.
I received a rejection letter recently because my submitted novella “wasn’t erotic enough”. It made me smile.  I truly didn’t mind. I won’t be adding to the already explicit descriptions, or leaving home to indulge in some physical research sessions.   
By being flexible, and saving the ‘diamonds’ in the script, I could remove all the sex scenes and turn it into a murder mystery. I have this lovely character in mind. I could use him as the lead. He’s rugged and lovable with a major problem. He doesn’t have a home, a plot or a reason to live – yet. I don’t care how many times he comes home from the publishers, his gnarly hand clasping yet another rejection slip; or how often I have to change his life to suit another publisher’s whim, I’m going to get him out there, covered in stars on Amazon -  one day.

Book and Author Spotlights